Leadership: Brexit, Cameron, May, next?
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2019 3:13 am
Now that the Brexit stalemate has resulted in Parliament taking control of the House of Commons, the role and impact of leaders is highlighted. The motives and strategies of individual leaders really do demonstrate the 'Butterfly Effect', how a single event (decision) can ripple out to dramatically shape and change the direction and momentum of the arbitrary World.
Brexit began with increasing concern over the direction and evolution of the EU. What started out as a free trade "club" was seen to be moving towards a European State in which all those things associated with the sovereignty of independent nations were gradually being eroded almost by stealth.
To placate dissent within the Tory party Cameron decided on a referendum for the nation to decide if the UK should remain in the EU or leave. Given the half-hearted effort of the remain side it is evident that they didn't think for one minute that the leave side would actually win.
It was also clear that the leave side didn't expect to win either. The behaviour of Johnson, (who appeared to be using the referendum as a platform for his own leadership aspirations) was unbelievably sheepish after the result was announced. There was no celebration as he and his fellow protagonists melted into the background and May came to prominence.
Again, to overcome dissent within her own party, and spectacularly misjudging the mood of a majority of the people, May called a snap election expecting to increase her majority, but in fact reducing it such that she would always be at the mercy of a small group of MPs with their own significant agenda. Hence the current impasse in the House and failed government.
It will be interesting to see where consensus politics leads us. Just a shame that strategy was not employed in the first place - but hey ho - that's another question. Do complex systems always require fulcrum points around which the entire system hinge and change direction?
Brexit began with increasing concern over the direction and evolution of the EU. What started out as a free trade "club" was seen to be moving towards a European State in which all those things associated with the sovereignty of independent nations were gradually being eroded almost by stealth.
To placate dissent within the Tory party Cameron decided on a referendum for the nation to decide if the UK should remain in the EU or leave. Given the half-hearted effort of the remain side it is evident that they didn't think for one minute that the leave side would actually win.
It was also clear that the leave side didn't expect to win either. The behaviour of Johnson, (who appeared to be using the referendum as a platform for his own leadership aspirations) was unbelievably sheepish after the result was announced. There was no celebration as he and his fellow protagonists melted into the background and May came to prominence.
Again, to overcome dissent within her own party, and spectacularly misjudging the mood of a majority of the people, May called a snap election expecting to increase her majority, but in fact reducing it such that she would always be at the mercy of a small group of MPs with their own significant agenda. Hence the current impasse in the House and failed government.
It will be interesting to see where consensus politics leads us. Just a shame that strategy was not employed in the first place - but hey ho - that's another question. Do complex systems always require fulcrum points around which the entire system hinge and change direction?